April 23, 2019


November 11, 2017- Mr Farooq Abdullah made a very shocking statement asserting that Pakistan owns POK and Kashmir should be divided accordingly into 2 parts. Off late           Mr Abdullah senior and Abdullah junior have been making irresponsible comments. Farooq, being the son of Sheikh Abdullah, does not shock one by the seditious nature of his statements. Let me contest the statements with facts and let me also refresh the readers with the actions of Sheikh Abdullah to understand the present stand of the Abdullahs.

First some points on the state of Jammu and Kashmir

JK was the largest princely state of erstwhile British India, with borders adjoining both Dominions of India and Pakistan. Let the point be clarified that only British India was divided into Pakistan and India- There was NO scope for any division of any princely state. The state had to accede completely to either Dominion and the power of accession was given to the ruler of princely state. Thus, within the scope of India Independence act 1947- Maharaja Hari Singh, Ruler of Jammu-Kashmir signed the instrument of accession like other princely states, Mountbatten countersigned it and on 26 Oct, 1947 State of Jammu-Kashmir acceded to India. This accession was not reversible and under Art 1 of Indian constitution, Areas can be added but not reduced. So is Farooq Abdullah advocating Sedition of a part of Jammu-Kashmir?

It is an Established fact that Pakistan attacked Jammu-Kashmir and occupied large areas of it consisting of Gilgit, Balistan, Ladakh (Skardu) Jammu area of Mirpur, Kotali, Poonch. How can  this area be a legitimate part of Pakistan? When this area was never in British India but belonged to Maharaja Hari Singh ruled Jammu-Kashmir?

A large part of Jammu Kashmir is occupied by Chinese, Minsar in Tibet which was a part of JK  was gifted away by Nehru to China, In 1963 Shaksgam valley in Pakistan occupied  Gilgit Balistan region of JK was Gifted by Pakistan to China. How can there be any basis for Pakistan to Claim occupied areas.

Inline image

Now let me come to legal Documents in addition to the instrument of Accession , cementing the assertion that Whole of JK state is an integral part of India

1) UN resolution-India approached the UN as a nation attacked by a neighbouring country-UN resolutions do not make any case of Pakistan having a right over Indian territory measuring upto 85,000 sq km it has occupied.

2) The  proclamation by Karan Singh on 25 Nov 1949 about implementation of Indian constitution

Inline image

3)The judgement of Pakistan SC on Gilgit Baltistan in 1994 that Gilgit and Baltistan are parts of Jammu and kashmir and Jammu Kashmir is not a part of Pakistan as per the constitution of Pakistan .

4) February 22,1994 Resolution by the Indian Parliament unanimously proclaiming whole of Jammu Kashmir to be an Integral Part of India.

Now we examine the role of Sheikh Abdullah in the pre and post Independent History of India with regard to Jammu and Kashmir.

  1. In 1930-31- Sheikh Abdullah lead agitations and protests against Maharaja Hari Singh. He gave inciting speeches in Mosques in Srinagar and incited stone pelting and violence. He was helped in this by Muslim youth coming in from British controlled Punjab. Maharaja Hari Singh arrested him for provoking unrest, but the protests continued until Maharaja Hari Singh signed  60 year lease of Gilgit-Balistan  with the British. Then the protests stopped.

2) When the Cabinet Mission came to India Sheikh Abdullah started a movement called ‘Maharaja,Quit Kashmir’.He was arrested for sedition.

3) Sheikh Abdullah knew he was not popular with Shias, Gurjars, Buddhists, Padhadi Muslims, Balti, Dardar tribes and Hindu population of Jammu,Kashmir. He left Muslim conference and formed Jammu Kashmir National Conference in 1939 which got support from Jawaharlal Nehru.

4) After Accession when the First Assembly elections were held in JK, Sheikh Abdullah cancelled the nomination of the Jammu  based Praja Parishad candidates and thus ensured win of National Conference. He propagated the Idea of a separate flag, Emblem and permits for JK. This was opposed vehemently by Sri S.P. Mukherji and Praja Parishad Members. Many Praja Parishad members attained Martyrdom while hoisting the tricolor and Sri S.P. Mukherjee attained Martyrdom in Srinagar while opposing two flags, two constitutions and permits to visit JK within India. 

5) The Delhi accord which was more of a committment between Nehru- Abdullah and the events leading to Martyrdom of S.P. Mukherjee lead to lots of Unease within NC itself. Deputy PM Ghulam Bakshi led the Revolt against Sheikh Abdullah – 15 members were against Sheikh Abdullah’s statement that Jammu Kashmir accession was conditional while only 4 supported him. The Members of Cabinet informed Karan Singh that they had lost confidence in Sheikh Abdullah, Leading to Dismissal of Sheikh Abdullah as Prime Minister of JK. Sheikh Abdullah was in Gulmarg that time and was on his way to Gilgit to proclaim Independence of JK . His plans were thwarted and he was Arrested.

Thus it comes as no surprise that Farooq Abdullah and Omar Abdullah make pro Pak statements and bat for Autonomy of JK and term the accession as conditional, inspite of proof present to the contrary.

Time has come to condemn such Statements. Not only condemn but according to laws these statements of Farooq Abdullah can be termed Seditious. As a citizen one hopes that the Government gives an adequate and befitting response to Farooq Abdullah who is an MP in Parliament.

Picture Credit: Jammu and Kashmir study centre, Screent shot from twitter , wikileaks4india.com



About Nidhi Bahuguna 36 Articles
Housewife, nationalist , loves reading and counter media lies with proof.
Contact: Twitter