Yogi Adityanath has been selected as the CM of Uttar Pradesh and till the day he gets elected as an s MLA, the opponents of BJP can bark that it is no better than Congress. After Yogi gets elected as MLA, he then becomes an elected CM of the people of UP. So the seculars have a few weeks time to rejoice on this point of elect-select issue.
Yogi Adityanath has been winning the MP seat for more than nearly 2 decades. This does not automatically mean that he is a great MP. What is important is that this MP is a highly participating MP in the lok sabha and it is obvious from the number of issues he raised. Merely raising issues in the Lok sabha does not make on a great MP as there are rabble rousers like Rahul, Sitaram, D Raja of the great secular variety. Winnability is no criteria for performance else the Italians would be the best performers.
Yogi Adityanath has worked for the good of all the people of his constituency without any bias. People quote some statements by different groups to support. Owaisi too might have worked for his people of his constituency even though he could not get his people to open bank accounts. The basic job of the MP is to work for the welfare of the people of his constituency and spend the funds at their disposal in a judicious manner.
Yogi Adityanath is educated. We have seen highly educated yet most idiotic MPs blabbering gober all day long. Education cannot be a great qualification for being a CM.
Yogi Adityanath is a Hindutva agent and has created allegedly communal organizations. This argument is laughable at best as the users of the word Hindutva cannot clearly explain what they mean by it. Though Hindutva is no as maligned as Secular, many are trying very hard to bring the value of this word and is a work in progress. Being a Mahant of the great temple, Yogi has an implicit duty to protect Dharma and hence it is no special argument as to why Yogi should be the CM.
The only sound argument why Yogi should become CM of UP is BJP has won the elections. Why should be there any other reason or justification for making a person a CM of a state? A state is having a CM who is selected by a convicted woman, murder as a tool for politics supporting CM, a Muslim quota fighting CM, perennial sleeping CM, an absent CM, separatist supporting CM, Islamic appeasing CM and several other types of CM are available and yet there is no need of any justification.
The Hindus should develop a thick skin and not give into the victimhood of the Economic-RW and the Feel Good-RW, Secular-RW, Fringe-RW and anti-RW groups. The simplest answer is Yogi is our CM, deal with it.
Picture Credit: https://www.hindujagruti.org/news/76579.html